The subcategory page structure is appropriate and understandable, because if you remove the main directory with general categories, the number of subcategories will multiply, logic will be lost, and site navigation will deteriorate, which will lead to an increase in the bounce rate and a decrease in user engagement.
On a page dedicated to wallpapers, there is everything belize telegram data except the correct distribution of cognitive load on the user. The huge number of buttons and icons makes the eyes water and the user's focus is blurred. There are also certain functional questions here, such as - how often do users search for wallpapers by manufacturer name? Why is the wallpaper brand duplicated in the carousel at the top of the page and in the filters on the right?
The selection of categories for the slider at the beginning of the page is also unclear, if the filter attributes duplicate it again. The upper slider has no logical content and a verified structure. It seems that the slider simply threw together wallpapers by purpose and types of wallpapers, which are again duplicated in the filter. It is necessary to analyze popular queries for the wallpaper category and, based on the data, make decisions about which subcategories to add to the slider.
The subcategory page structure is appropriate and clear
-
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2024 2:47 am