But is this really the case?

[sumaiyakhatun26]

CHARGING FOR THE RESULT – WHY I DO NOT RECOMMEND THIS SOLUTION
In fact, one might start by asking why performance-based billing is such a controversial topic.

In theory, this is an ideal pro-client solution. If your work pays off, the client earns money or achieves other goals they care about, then you get paid. If it doesn't, the client simply doesn't pay.

This seems like a fair deal.

And it's actually a little suspicious if you don't agree to something like that. poland rcs data Because why wouldn't you want to agree?

Do you think you are not able to deliver results? That your work will not be of quality?

So why are you taking on this client or wanting to start working with them if you don't believe the project will be a success? You don't believe in it enough to risk your fee?



In my opinion, these arguments are not entirely valid and there are a few things we need to consider in the context of performance accounting to be able to say why I think this model is ineffective in principle.