Collaborating with Nonprofits to Build a Network

[shishir.seoexpert1]

Funding of public audiovisual media, reported per inhabitant of the countries concerned, is low but almost entirely provided by the State. The audience shares of public audiovisual media are high there but the public media are not independent of the public authorities . This is the case in Botswana and Tunisia. On the other hand, in the "Corporatist-Democratic" media system, the funding of public audiovisual media per inhabitant is high and mainly public. It is also often provided on a multi-year basis , a factor that secures .


Brings together very large audience shares. Finally, the national legal ghana phone number library framework guarantees the full independence of the media. This system is that of the Scandinavian countries or even Germany as well as the United Kingdom . In addition to these two radically opposed models, the study presents three intermediate models. In particular, there is the " Liberal-Pluralist " media system in which public broadcasting benefits from less funding in volume but where this funding is mainly public. The legal guarantees of the independence of public media are a little less than in the "Corporatist-Democratic" system and the audience shares a little lower.

However, the most widespread model is called the " Direct Funding " system. In this model, the funding of public broadcasting is more directly linked to its audiences in the form of audiovisual royalties (license fees) or other equivalent taxes. The proportion of public funding varies quite a bit depending on the countries favoring this system . It is also generally accompanied by strong legal guarantees of the independence of public media and its audience .