Even before I finished writing

[hasinam2206]

I wrote a plan, sketched out the abstract → showed it to the editor → he approved → wrote it, sent it → the editor came and said that I had deviated from the original idea

I reread it — and indeed, instead of answering "what to do," it turned out more like "now I'll tell you why you need to know what to do" → I rewrote it, sent it → I go to Google Docs and see again a big scary comment that hints at rewriting.

And all this despite the fact that all the explanations malta telegram data and advice are correct. The only problem is that they are useless for a beginner. He still doesn’t know anything about the warmth of the target audience, sales funnels, and the difference between business objectives and reader needs, and explaining everything is overloading the letter and changing its purpose, which means it needs to be done differently.

We went through different ideas, came in from one side, then the other, wrote new plans together, and I wrote new text. Each time at the planning stage it seemed that this time everything was ok, but it wasn't.

it was clear to me that this wasn't quite the same. But I wrote anyway. No, not in the hope of taking it out of boredom, but so that there would be something to collectively discuss and understand why we came to the wrong place again.

Edits are just work, not a personal insult
Claims to the text ≠ claims to the personality. It's just a work process.